<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Oregon Divorce Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>a service of stephensfamilylaw.com</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on New Case Law: Circumcision as the basis for custody modification? by Hot topics &#171; Holly Fox&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/new-case-law-circumcision-as-the-basis-for-custody-modification/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot topics &#171; Holly Fox&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/?p=61#comment-465</guid>
		<description>[...] New case law: circumcision as the basis for custody modification?  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New case law: circumcision as the basis for custody modification?  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Case Law: Circumcision as the basis for custody modification? by Nolo’s Divorce, Custody, and Family Law Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Religious Issues in Custody Cases, Revisited</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/new-case-law-circumcision-as-the-basis-for-custody-modification/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>Nolo’s Divorce, Custody, and Family Law Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Religious Issues in Custody Cases, Revisited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/?p=61#comment-462</guid>
		<description>[...] explained in more detail in the Oregon Divorce Blog, in Boldt and Boldt the Supreme Court remanded the case to the trial court for additional testimony [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] explained in more detail in the Oregon Divorce Blog, in Boldt and Boldt the Supreme Court remanded the case to the trial court for additional testimony [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contributors by Curious...</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/contributors/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/contributors/#comment-446</guid>
		<description>I would love to read a post about any cases where one spouse was not a legal citizen, or resident for that matter.
Can that be a factor with custody? what about Spousal support if the spouse can't legally work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to read a post about any cases where one spouse was not a legal citizen, or resident for that matter.<br />
Can that be a factor with custody? what about Spousal support if the spouse can&#8217;t legally work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Case Law: Property division, inherited property, and a clear trial court record. by anonymous</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/new-case-law-property-division-inherited-property-and-a-clear-trial-court-record/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 06:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/?p=75#comment-445</guid>
		<description>Interesting. The rules regarding division of inheritance in Oregon are not clear to me. I have read alternately that all property acquired during marriage is a 'marital asset', but I have also read that inheritance is a non-marital asset.

How would an inherited 401k account be treated, assuming that both parties are gainfully employed with approximately equal salaries, a sufficiently large estate that neither party would need support, and no children needing support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. The rules regarding division of inheritance in Oregon are not clear to me. I have read alternately that all property acquired during marriage is a &#8216;marital asset&#8217;, but I have also read that inheritance is a non-marital asset.</p>
<p>How would an inherited 401k account be treated, assuming that both parties are gainfully employed with approximately equal salaries, a sufficiently large estate that neither party would need support, and no children needing support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 10 list:  Top 10 questions to ask a divorce lawyer in the first consultation. by VA Family Law Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to pick a lawyer (at least this is how I&#8217;d do it)</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/2008/02/10/top-10-questions-to-ask-a-divorce-lawyer-at-the-first-consultation/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>VA Family Law Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to pick a lawyer (at least this is how I&#8217;d do it)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/?p=70#comment-439</guid>
		<description>[...] interesting post from another lawyer blogger on the same topic is here.  Topics: Tips and Tricks &#124; Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interesting post from another lawyer blogger on the same topic is here.  Topics: Tips and Tricks | Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 10 list: Top 10 things to NOT do during your divorce. by Divorce Help Network &#187; Things NOT to Do During Your Divorce</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/2007/12/14/top-10-list-top-10-things-to-not-do-during-your-divorce/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Divorce Help Network &#187; Things NOT to Do During Your Divorce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/2007/12/14/top-10-list-top-10-things-to-not-do-during-your-divorce/#comment-438</guid>
		<description>[...] following information is from the The Oregon Divorce Blog:Divorce is not easy. There are many pitfalls and traps awaiting parties that have not educated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] following information is from the The Oregon Divorce Blog:Divorce is not easy. There are many pitfalls and traps awaiting parties that have not educated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Divorce Myth: Your spouse can block a divorce by objecting to it. by Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/divorce-myth-your-spouse-can-block-a-divorce-by-objecting-to-it/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/?p=66#comment-437</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the your comments regarding spouse can not stop a divorce.  The comments appear to be written from the petitioners perspective.  In other words, the respondent can not stop divorce just by ignoring - well here is a situation that I would like your comments on....what if the petitioner trys to stop papers after they have been signed and submitted to the court - only thing pending is us attending parenting session this week (we live in Multnomah County).  He claims he did not read the papers and now trying to stop.  We read through the papers together before submitting to his attorney, they were notarized and signed by both of us, submitted to the court by his attorney - now he is trying to stop them.  Another interesting item; he requested the 90 period be waived, which I agreed to - we have been apart for over 1.5 years.

Would also like to know what happens if one party does not attend parenting session - will divorce go through with restrictions around visitation?  

Thank you for your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the your comments regarding spouse can not stop a divorce.  The comments appear to be written from the petitioners perspective.  In other words, the respondent can not stop divorce just by ignoring - well here is a situation that I would like your comments on&#8230;.what if the petitioner trys to stop papers after they have been signed and submitted to the court - only thing pending is us attending parenting session this week (we live in Multnomah County).  He claims he did not read the papers and now trying to stop.  We read through the papers together before submitting to his attorney, they were notarized and signed by both of us, submitted to the court by his attorney - now he is trying to stop them.  Another interesting item; he requested the 90 period be waived, which I agreed to - we have been apart for over 1.5 years.</p>
<p>Would also like to know what happens if one party does not attend parenting session - will divorce go through with restrictions around visitation?  </p>
<p>Thank you for your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Here come the brides: the Oregon Family Fairness Act by Wendy</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/2008/02/17/here-come-the-brides-the-oregon-family-fairness-act/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/?p=82#comment-436</guid>
		<description>Thank you for another very informative post! Glad I found this corner of the web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for another very informative post! Glad I found this corner of the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 10 list: Top 10 things to NOT do during your divorce. by Ten (10) Things NOT to Do During Your Divorce &#124; Org Legal</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/2007/12/14/top-10-list-top-10-things-to-not-do-during-your-divorce/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Ten (10) Things NOT to Do During Your Divorce &#124; Org Legal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/2007/12/14/top-10-list-top-10-things-to-not-do-during-your-divorce/#comment-434</guid>
		<description>[...] The Oregon Divorce Blog posts this, “Top 10 things to NOT do during your divorce.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Oregon Divorce Blog posts this, “Top 10 things to NOT do during your divorce.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introducing Domestic Partnerships by Wendy</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/introducing-domestic-partnerships/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/?p=77#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Wow, interesting! Found this site by happenstance, but will check back to see what you may post here! We are very grateful to have been able to register for an Oregon Domestic Partnership after 9 years together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, interesting! Found this site by happenstance, but will check back to see what you may post here! We are very grateful to have been able to register for an Oregon Domestic Partnership after 9 years together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
